RockstarMentality
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2009
- Messages
- 1,240
- Reaction score
- 4
im bumping this thread cuz theres nothing yall can do about it lol
RockstarMentality said:oh jeez. the guy with an SRT4 caught hell, my advice to you would be to just stop talkin bout your honda, and just keep it to yourself if you think you can beat half the cars on this site, whether you can or not
RockstarMentality said:yeah and when u start talkin bout how badass it is you get some kickback dont you?
allz im sayin is, this is a Mustang site. I give credit where credit is due, however many people on here hate it if its not rockin a blue oval. but when ppl start runnin their mouth bout their econoboxes, i just assume its the same claims as all other ricers.
"your fnckin mustang aint sh!t FU Whitey. aint got sh!t on me. why? cuz i have VTEC MOTHAFVCKA! it makes like 1098372 hp at idle i have dyno sheets"
okay man, im sure your shitvic hauls a*s those cars are just particularly douchebag-prone
+1got5.0 said:IBTL
greenscobie86 said:Cliff notes on the above?
got5.0 said:greenscobie86 said:Cliff notes on the above?
start respecting the properly modded 4 cyl cars because they are badass and will rape your mustang.
RockstarMentality said:where oh where to begin...
1. first off, why do people always bring up the s2k to defend the shitvic? i dont bring up the Ford GT to defend the mustang.
Because the S2000 is in the 10,000-15,000 price range now. The Ford GT is a supercar in a completely different price range.
2. not hard to triple 90whp
A bit more than that but close enough. I disagree that it is so easy to triple the power output and keep everything mostly stock.... on my Mustang triple = 780hp
3. any ET with -teen as a suffix is slow.
My 13-12sec examples were with the H22 and K20 engines which would be left 100% stock while maintaining factory reliability and daily drivability. So obviously the goal is not the max power but just an example of what a stock 2.0Liter Honda engine runs. Those times are comparable to the new 5.0 Mustang with newer technology and 2.5X the engine.
4. most "sports cars" handling suck stock. i know mine does, and i have better shocks/struts, bigger brakes, and a lighter car than everyone else...stock. not to mention you cant compare a MODIFIED civic to a STOCK wrx.
Drive a Civic on a twisty road. The handling is comparable to a 911 (yes I do have a 911)
6. its a freaking 1.6 liter, so buy a 4.6 and turbo it and make way more power. i fail to understand your argument here.
It doesn't matter as long as it goes fast. A 10sec turbo 1.6Liter or a 10sec 4.6 turbo... Both are fun. The point was that people don't give them enough credit.
now, i would like to say, .0000000000001% of civics can actually live up to the game the owner is talking. to the rest of them "oh yeah its fully built, it will stomp your fnckin mustang like a junebug" means they have an ebay ram air intake and a spoiler duct taped on, and theyll probly have to push it across the finish line. "cuz my vtec isnt working, i woulda had you"
This is the reason I started arguing. Misinformation. Yes there are ricers running around but what do you expect after the fast and the furious movie came out and all the kids watched it?
There are plenty of fast FWD 4cyl running around. Mine runs, yes it is a civic, it is FAR from fully built, in fact, mostly stock. it makes nearly 400hp and weighs 1900lbs so you do the math.