Its official the 2valve pi manifold has ceased production.

OP
OP
96blak54

96blak54

Moderator
Staff member
Staff
Joined
Feb 21, 2011
Messages
15,651
Reaction score
6,548
Location
Lawrenceburg Kentucky
Some interesting info from the article

" This production, composite intake manifold is the same exact piece used on the 2001-2004 Ford Mustang GT equipped with the SOHC, two-valve, naturally-aspirated 4.6L V8, too. However, it’s manufactured on brand new tooling, interestingly enough"

UHM.......no.....no its not.
 

07GtS197

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
4,044
Reaction score
2,945
Location
Fort Myers, Fl
The thing is Ford will still make a lot of money on these just because it’s an “oem” part. I’m surprised another company hasn’t stepped up with a design closer to the stock intake. It’s a shame really.
 

Mustang5L5

Active Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2023
Messages
916
Reaction score
1,029
Some more pics coming out. Does look like it's a revised Dorman. Some improvements have been made. Replacable heater core hose nipple, brass inserts for the fuel rail bolts and COPS. I also have not seen any reference to this new intake shipping with a alternator bracket, so it looks like it was designed to retain the original Mustang style bracket.

It does appear this intake uses integrated gaskets, just like Dormans do.

Regardless of if Dorman is the manufacturer, or someone else, it doesn't change the fact that this new intake is NOT the same as the previous version which featured the deep plunging plenum, so it will suffer the same HP loss.

Again, right now i'm assuming this is a dorman due to the runner design. Will need more info before we can really confirm.


Capture2.JPG

Capture23.JPG


Capture2x3.JPG

Captured2.JPG
 
Last edited:

Mustang5L5

Active Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2023
Messages
916
Reaction score
1,029
So i wanted to try and confirm this is a Dorman, or at least a hybrid Dorman. SInce i had the one I pulled off my car, i decided to give it a quick look.

So first, here's a Amazon link to a Dorman intake for a 99-04 GT. The Dorman 615-175


I have one of these, so lets look at some of the features up close and in person. ALL of these photos are the Dorman 615-175

First, this particular logo on runner #5, in addition to torque info on runner #6 and notably the bolt torque sequence scattered around the intake
IMG_1166.jpeg


Opposite side features the "MADE IN USA" on runner 1, and gasket info on #2
IMG_1167.jpeg

On runner #4 is this noticable feature.
IMG_1168.jpeg

Finally, part number on the bottom
IMG_1169.jpeg




Now, what's important to note is the Dorman intake is sold under other brands as well. Either licenced and reboxed, or perhaps some china knockoffs. No wait to comfirm if the latter, but if you look around and compare the above features, you'll see they match.

Here is an OPR branded intake, which is a dorman. Look at the photos, especially the logo on runner #5. Same as above.


And here is one of the no-name intakes. Possible rebox, or ripped off copy. Hard to say. But look at the features. A lot of the mold markings are wiped, but the torque sequence is present on the runners. I think this is a Dorman copy

 
Last edited:
As an eBay Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Mustang5L5

Active Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2023
Messages
916
Reaction score
1,029
Now, here is the Dorman compared to an OEM 01-04 intake manifold made the traditional way. You can clearly see the difference in runner design.

Dorman (same intake as above) on the right. Not shown is the height difference due to the deep plunging plenum on the original (left) intake.
IMG_8634.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Mustang5L5

Active Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2023
Messages
916
Reaction score
1,029
Now to compare the new Ford Racing intake and why I think it's a revised/updated Dorman-made product.


Found a pic I could blow up off ebay

1722388970034.png

There are differences, but there are some features which are distinct. First off, it's a distinct "spider" pattern of runners which Dorman is known for. But there are changes from the above intake. The internal support ribbing is different compared to the dorman intake 1 post up. But if you study the plastic mold, there are similarities.

Other difference, as mentioned, the fuel rail and COP bolt holes are brass inserts.

Similar features to the Dorman?
- Made in USA on runner 1 (different style)
- Torque sequence info on runner #2. It's almost word for word exact. They rearranged the sentences slightly
- "dent" on runner #4

Here's the new Ford intake
1722389258117.png

ANd heres the dorman. Perhaps this is a required feature for both intakes, so not a smoking gun here
1722389312627.png
 

Mustang5L5

Active Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2023
Messages
916
Reaction score
1,029
Separate post for the stamped torque sequence.

Dorman Intake
IMG_1172.jpeg


And now the new Ford Intake (best angle i could get)
1722389569082.png

But compare the wording. The order of phrases is slightly rearranged however.
 
Last edited:

Mustang5L5

Active Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2023
Messages
916
Reaction score
1,029
The underside plenums are slightly different. However, i have a photo showing the plenum depth is still short.


But here's the underside of the new Ford intake. No Dorman part number here. The actual lower plenum does appear molded slightly different. Does look a little bigger. Will need a better pic.
1722389800168.png




VS a real Dorman intake. Slightly different shape.

IMG_1171.jpeg



But here's a side by side of the new Ford intake and the original OE PI intake.
IMG_1165.jpeg
 

Mustang5L5

Active Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2023
Messages
916
Reaction score
1,029
Finally gaskets. The above pics clearly show impregnated rubber gaskers on the intake, but this is interesting on Ford site

1722390053114.png


It states a gasket set is required and gives a part number

But if you search the P/N, it's a different gasket pair than what was used on the Mustang. So curious to see how this actually installs. Looking for a pic of the full kit as we speak.

1722390158691.png
 

Mustang5L5

Active Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2023
Messages
916
Reaction score
1,029
Anyway, clearly we can see this intake is not exactly the same as the Dorman 615-175 intake. There are enough differences that it's another intake altogether. However, comparing them, there is evidence it may be a Dorman-made variant that Ford had revised for some reasons. The smoking gun will be if a 2025-later produced Dorman kit starts to be delivered the same way. I'd imagine Dorman would try to keep costs down, so why make two intakes for the same application, especially when they can increase volume on the new one to bring down average cost, and sell it cheaper. Makes sense unless Ford put some sort of restriction on them.

Either way, i have no way to say 100% without a doubt it's a dorman. While I suspect it, there's no way to confirm it at this time.

Folks are starting to received kits that were on backorder. Some are disappointed it's a revised intake. WOuld be curious to see LMR do a dyno on this.

Trying to find a pic of the full kit and/or install instructions.
 
OP
OP
96blak54

96blak54

Moderator
Staff member
Staff
Joined
Feb 21, 2011
Messages
15,651
Reaction score
6,548
Location
Lawrenceburg Kentucky
I will definitely be on the look out for a dyno comparison. And who knows, maybe this design has a similar comparison performance wise. You know the ford npi and pi intake "look" similar to the untrained eye.

Me seeing production of intake manifolds for 5 years, I see differences in the injection process that doesnt match the dorman, so there is hope for a better performer.
 

Mustang5L5

Active Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2023
Messages
916
Reaction score
1,029
Yeah, For now i'd hesitate to say "It's a dorman" and leave it at that. It's a different intake, but its similar to the Dorman in terms of runner overall design.

Will need to wait for installs and perhaps a dyno comparison.
 
OP
OP
96blak54

96blak54

Moderator
Staff member
Staff
Joined
Feb 21, 2011
Messages
15,651
Reaction score
6,548
Location
Lawrenceburg Kentucky
Yea, the new pi intake is no where near the same as the dorman. Total different manifold. Knowing the tooling associated to assemble the multiple shells of this type of manifold, no other "visual appearing" type plastic shell will fit into the die tooling associated with welding the shells together. The tooling is literally specific to the compont. Its a negative copy of the manifold component being welded and roughly 10,000lbs. And can be multiple dies depending on how many shells the manifold is made up. I cant see a simple "its the same as a dorman" copy. This manifold may appear like a dorman, but its miles apart in design.

Ill admit....im sort of hopeful now. Maybe this new design might be a major surprise! Gotta keep in mind when the pi intake was designed. If it showed up in 99, it was engineered and designed at minimum 2years before. So 1997 to 2022...15years of manifold design knowledge gained, im hopeful we will see a surprise.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
78,555
Messages
1,536,137
Members
16,201
Latest member
jgib8795

Members online

Top