coats04 said:lets talk motor options here.without braking the bank...
you have pi2v motors
4v from the mark8
pi swapped npi
anyone here done the mark8 motor swap?
can you get 350-400 n/a hp from any of these?
coats04 said:sumbitch! drink a little whiskey and the stang starts talkin to me!
i have to figure this thing out alot of people looking down on my car right now.i need to come back and bust some ass. :slap:
voidfinger said:nes said:just to cheer some npi2v angries up, mine went 14.3 at 96 in pretty stock form with the addition of an xpipe and a intake(custom done with some pvc piping and a k&n filter). its really in how well you drive it, it also spanked a bolton lt1 car with a built tranny when it was NA... maybe you guys need to practice some more if you believe that the gt wasnt able to compete with the lt1.... :dunno:
are you sure it wasn't a v6? or was he just messing with you? Just wondering b/c my friend has a bolt on lt1 with a cam and it put down 36X rwhp on a dynojet... my car put down 185 rwhp on a mustang dyno sooo maybe 200 on a dyno jet... I just don't see the two running close at all.... but yea, he's in the high 12's...
coats04 said:took a shot of whiskey grabbed a smoke and walked out side and was checking out my car,damn that ***** is sexy!
how about throwing the pi heads on with alittle port work and juicing it 150 shot?
coats04 said:guys it makes my stomach sick,i havent driven the car in 2 weeks im so sick.my best was 14.75@94mph.
i spun everytime i tried everyway to get out idle,2500,3,3500,4k,heat the tires real good,dont heat them,bark them just a little,slip the clutch out of the whole i mean everything.my times ranged from 15.2-14.7 most where around 14.8/9's.
i love the sn95's ive had 3 now.my 95 was a monster
the wifes 97 aode was ok but gutless
this 97 feels real good,strong even and doesnt miss a beat.killer shifts and all.the front jerks up hard when shifting into second,feels great.
i felt a big difference in pull on the big end with the pi intake but the pi cams i put in didnt show me crap.
i wish i could get this thing to move ,just seems any mods you do just arnet worth it because i dont see any good hp numbers coming out of these motors unless they're boosted,witch i cant afford... makes me sick uke:
SilverSol said:coats04 said:guys it makes my stomach sick,i havent driven the car in 2 weeks im so sick.my best was 14.75@94mph.
i spun everytime i tried everyway to get out idle,2500,3,3500,4k,heat the tires real good,dont heat them,bark them just a little,slip the clutch out of the whole i mean everything.my times ranged from 15.2-14.7 most where around 14.8/9's.
i love the sn95's ive had 3 now.my 95 was a monster
the wifes 97 aode was ok but gutless
this 97 feels real good,strong even and doesnt miss a beat.killer shifts and all.the front jerks up hard when shifting into second,feels great.
i felt a big difference in pull on the big end with the pi intake but the pi cams i put in didnt show me crap.
i wish i could get this thing to move ,just seems any mods you do just arnet worth it because i dont see any good hp numbers coming out of these motors unless they're boosted,witch i cant afford... makes me sick uke:
because of our lack of displacement. we really have no choice BUT to use some type of power adder.
Corbic said:I've only had my car for about 3 months now, and I too kick my self in the ass every now and then.
Piss poor handling and ancient suspension...
215hp out of a V8 that drinks gas at 18-20mpg... ugly interior..mushy steering, odd seating position..
But then again, for less then two and half grand, what the hell else can you get? A gutless 110hp Civic? A busted Caviliar?
Sure if I saved a few more pennies and shopped around I could score an LT1 F-body for 3k, but... yeah.. even worse interior, horrid visibility, wedge shape styling.. and reliability that makes the Mustang look like a '90 Corrola.
The Mustang is cheaper than the F-body and more practical, it has better visability, better seating and only uses regular gas. It made compromises to appeal to a wider range of buyers, and that is why the Mustang is still in production and GM is going to be once again late to the game with the reintroduction of the Camaro..
1996 Mustang GT stock is basically 0-60 in 6 seconds and 1/4 in 15
1996 Camaro was around 0-60 in 5.7 and 1/4 in 14.1
(per C&D)
1996 Turbo DSM (Talon/Eclipse) do 6.4 to 60 and 15 in the 1/4
There is not a whole lot out there in that time frame that was "blistering" fast, in fact, that WAS fast.
As for power-adders, I think the only real disadvantage the Mustang has over other cars (S13s, Hondas, DSMs) is you can't slap on a turbo for $1,000, swap in a engine with dramatic results for $2,600, or crank up the boost for $800 and see huge gains.
coats04 said:f**k it i swapped it for my freinds clean foxbody gt yoday.my next sn95 will be a 94/95 forsure.ill have another. >
96GT said:coats04 said:f**k it i swapped it for my freinds clean foxbody gt yoday.my next sn95 will be a 94/95 forsure.ill have another. >
The 94-95's the best of both worlds.
Get Money said:96GT said:coats04 said:f**k it i swapped it for my freinds clean foxbody gt yoday.my next sn95 will be a 94/95 forsure.ill have another. >
The 94-95's the best of both worlds.
except for the taillights :hammer: :hammer: :hammer: