School a 4v Guy

switch96

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2009
Messages
2,165
Reaction score
0
I apologize in advance for my naivety. What year 5.0's (Foxes and SN's) had solid/flat tappet and what years had hydraulic/roller or solid/roller, etc. Just curious :grin:
 
OP
OP
S

switch96

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2009
Messages
2,165
Reaction score
0
Haha, not for this car :grin:

Just getting into building, I don't really want to start with a flat tappet motor.
 

hottwheels04

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2006
Messages
2,150
Reaction score
14
I belive anything newer mid 80's and up is solid roller, I kno the old school 60's-70'searly 80's were flat tappet I belive, When I 1st got my 5.0 the stock motor was junk and i put in a junkyard 1970's 351 and that was flat tappet it was junk sounded likea tractor, alot of torque but had no power with a cam swap to flat tappet conversion it made a big diff.
 

Paul

Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2007
Messages
9,859
Reaction score
255
No Mustang (that I know of) ever came with a solid (mechanical) roller cam.

All of the 87-95 5.0s were hydraulic roller.
 

NXcoupe

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
1,369
Reaction score
80
Thank you Paul, I was about to blow a gasket here! Ok, 85 was the first year for a roller cam, hydraulic roller cam. 84 and earlier had flat tappet hydraulic camshafts. 82 and later had 50 oz inbalance and the 81 and earliers had the 28 oz. I may be off a year here correct me if I'm wrong and I will change it. 94 was the first year for a hydraulic roller cam 351, very rare to find, as they only made these for a few years. All other 351's were flat tappet hydraulic. Ford has not used a solid flat tappet camshaft since 1967 with the end of the 289 hipo engines. Earlier 260 V8's some had solid camshafts I believe. Hope this clears up things.
 

Paul

Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2007
Messages
9,859
Reaction score
255
Thanks for added info. I couldn't remember when 5.0s switched from hydraulic flat tappet to hydraulic roller. Mostly because I'm old and senile.
 

NXcoupe

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
1,369
Reaction score
80
No worries, since they put me in the home, I have a lot more free time to memorize useless tidbits of info.










J/K!!!
 

96_SVT_Cobra

SN95 Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2009
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
7
Location
Orlando
prolly a dumb question, but is there an advantage to having a hydraulic roller cam over a solid flat tapped cam cuz im thinking about building a 351 based motor?
 

Paul

Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2007
Messages
9,859
Reaction score
255
Roller motor can have more aggressive cam profiles (ramp rates) so you can "bang" the valves open more quickly.

You can convert flat tappet blocks to roller. I did. There are topics covering the conversion on here.
 

Blind

Active Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2008
Messages
473
Reaction score
2
automatic (and CFI) `85 mustangs still had the flat tappet cam, trucks still had the flat tappet in `86 for sure because I owned an EFI, flat tappet `86 f-150 5.0, I believe the trucks all had the flat tappet blocks until `94 just like the 5.8L trucks did.

carb mustangs in `85 got the roller blocks, as did all 86+ 5.0 mustangs.
 

NXcoupe

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
1,369
Reaction score
80
I was focusing on mustangs. Yes, even tho they were CFI and flat tappet hydraulic, they still had a roller block if it was in a mustang. I know for a fact that an 89 truck had a roller block, but had a flat tappet hydraulic cam in it. and the bolt holes were not tapped for the spyder hold down bolts. I pulled one out and apart from an 89.
 

5.0kid

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2008
Messages
1,370
Reaction score
3
idk, i have what was said to be an 86 block from a truck and it was not a roller block-didn't even have the spots to drill and tap some, so i had to put in the link-bar lifters to convert it.
 

Paul

Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2007
Messages
9,859
Reaction score
255
Nah. All I did was drill/tap the block for the spider retainer, then use OEM lifters/dogbones. Ed Curtis cut the cam and it was no problem.

Paul.
 

GDTrumbo

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 30, 2008
Messages
1,201
Reaction score
0
Location
Nashville, TN
NXcoupe said:
Thank you Paul, I was about to blow a gasket here! Ok, 85 was the first year for a roller cam, hydraulic roller cam. 84 and earlier had flat tappet hydraulic camshafts. 82 and later had 50 oz inbalance and the 81 and earliers had the 28 oz. I may be off a year here correct me if I'm wrong and I will change it. 94 was the first year for a hydraulic roller cam 351, very rare to find, as they only made these for a few years. All other 351's were flat tappet hydraulic. Ford has not used a solid flat tappet camshaft since 1967 with the end of the 289 hipo engines. Earlier 260 V8's some had solid camshafts I believe. Hope this clears up things.

Don't forget about the '69 & '70 302 & '71 351 BOSS engines. Were they not solid flat tappet also??

GT
 

Blind

Active Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2008
Messages
473
Reaction score
2
Paul said:
Nah. All I did was drill/tap the block for the spider retainer, then use OEM lifters/dogbones. Ed Curtis cut the cam and it was no problem.

Paul.

the cam is critical, and can't be as radical as a true roller blocks cam can be, the 351w I'm building right now is a `91 block and will need what's called a 'small base circle' cam so that the lifters don't stick too far out of the block and get proper oiling.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
78,530
Messages
1,535,668
Members
16,185
Latest member
dmen76

Members online

Top