I think you misunderstood what I was saying and ran complete different direction. I wasn't going into any of that. I was simply stating that a spoiler will create a lot of drag, because that's how it works.
Okay - I understand things differently :/ A wing (or airfoil) is the one that creates a lot of drag. A spoiler (a la Nascar) does not create drag, but actually reduces it.
The advantage of a wing/airfoil: depending on the setup, generates TONS of downforce. This is used for faster corners. However, the more downforce, the more drag created (the give/take of wings). So top end and acceleration are lost, however the downforce generated allows one to take corners a lot faster. Thus the trade-off.
The advantage of spoilers: they encourage the air to take a different path off the trunk/rear end. Which is one of the worst flow areas on a car. On a normal sedan, the air flows off the trunk and angles towards the ground (creating lift on the rear - wings do the *opposite* of this by angling the air upwards, thus downforce). A spoiler creates a sort of dead zone between the rear window and trunk. This dead zone encourages the faster moving air (laminar) to go around it. Air takes the path of least resistance. This creates a smoother, slicker transition off the rear, letting the air leave the trunk straight back to a little upwards. Because of this, no lift is created in the rear - however not a lot of downforce is created. So the spoiler actually makes the car smoother through the air, it reduces drag.
Real word examples of the above: a F1 car with a wing. F1 cars travel on (mostly) flat tracks, so massive downforce is needed to stay at speed in the corners. At the expense of drag. Nascar, however, have those massive banked turns - these provide the downforce for the car so a massive wing is not needed. Instead, they use spoilers (both front and rear, where F1 uses wings front and rear) to make the car slicker through the air and increase acceleration and top-speed. If Nascar was ran on flat ground without the banked turns, I suspect they would be running wings rather than spoilers.
Edit: so, despite that the spoiler looks like a wall on the trunk and thus one would think creates drag, when properly setup it in fact does the opposite. Though you do not get any real downforce out of it, but really a cancellation of the lift effect on the rear of the car.
Edit edit: whether one is to run a wing or a spoiler depends on the track type. On flat tracks, people tend to use wings to benefit from the downforce. You will most likely *not* see a time attack car for normal tracks with a spoiler - they will almost always have massive wings. For the type of tracks OP runs on, I would think a smaller wing (though a bit larger than the Shinoda) would be more beneficial than the spoiler. However, OP may not be traction limited in the corners, so a wing is not needed. For a car with not a lot of power, I would think a spoiler would be more beneficial than a wing. The more power the car has, the more a wing becomes more beneficial. IMHO.
Edit edit edit: I also think this lends to the statements that the "stock" Mustang wings "don't do anything." And they right - if they are thinking it's actually a wing and is supposed to generate downforce. It's not. It actually acts more like a spoiler, despite the "wing" shape. The air won't travel under the wing, so it's really a spoiler. Which is good for a stock car (less drag, better MPG, etc.). If people are expecting downforce from the stock wing, they are expecting something it wasn't really designed to do. And obviously it won't generate any downforce as it's not really a true wing.
Edit edit edit edit: I decided to create a new thread on this rather than polluting OP's build thread. It's
here. Sorry OP!